Google’s AI overviews face Italian complaint: how to keep your name visible

When was the last time you clicked past the first answer on Google? Most people stop at the summary on top. These days, that summary isn’t written by a journalist or a blogger—it’s written by artificial intelligence.

Google’s AI Overviews, which generate quick summaries in search results, are changing how people access information. But as these summaries take up more space, publishers and creators are starting to worry. Their work fuels the system, yet their visibility is shrinking.

That tension surfaced in October 2025 when Italian news publishers filed a formal complaint against Google. They allege that AI Overviews use their reporting without fair attribution or compensation.

The case highlights a bigger question that matters to anyone who creates content: when AI becomes the storyteller, how do you make sure your name still shows up?

What’s happening: the Italian complaint

Italian media groups submitted complaints to both the country’s competition and data-protection authorities. They argue that Google’s AI Overviews repurpose their content, sometimes word-for-word, to answer user questions directly in search.

Their concern is that readers get information without ever visiting the original site, cutting off the clicks that sustain journalism.

They’re also worried about context. When AI summarizes, it can strip nuance and present information without credit or with minimal attribution buried below the fold. The publishers say that undermines their credibility and distorts fair competition.

The request now before regulators is to examine whether Google’s approach violates copyright rules or abuses market dominance under EU law.

This isn’t happening in isolation. France, Spain, and Australia have all clashed with Google over similar issues in recent years. Italy’s complaint brings that debate into the era of generative AI, where snippets have become summaries and ownership has become even harder to define.

How AI Overviews change visibility

AI Overviews sit at the top of search results and summarize answers from multiple sources in plain, conversational text. Citations appear below, but they’re often small, grey links hidden under expandable sections.

For many users, the overview feels complete on its own.

This design shifts how visibility works online. Ranking high on a search results page once meant recognition and traffic. Now the AI Overview captures attention first, and the original source becomes optional reading. Even when your link is included, the reader may never connect your name with the information they consume.

SEO specialists have already noticed declines in organic visits for informational content. Some early analyses show drops of up to 34.5% in heavily affected categories.

But traffic loss tells only part of the story. The deeper impact lies in brand erosion — when people absorb your ideas without associating them with you.

The branding angle: visibility versus convenience

For publishers, reduced clicks translate directly into lost revenue and weaker audience relationships.

For independent creators, consultants, and educators, the risk is more personal: your insights might appear in AI-generated text without your name attached.

That loss of visibility has a quiet cost. Readers remember ideas, not always the person behind them. Over time, your authority can fade even as your words continue to circulate. Convenience favors the aggregator, not the author.

Today’s challenge is maintaining recognition in an ecosystem that prioritizes answers over sources. Success depends less on ranking for a keyword and more on being identifiable inside AI-produced summaries. Your name, tone, and credibility need to survive the algorithmic translation.

The ethical and regulatory questions

Italian regulators are approaching the case from three angles: copyright, competition, and data protection.

On copyright, they’re asking whether Google’s AI systems are republishing protected material in a way that substitutes for the original.

On competition, they’re assessing whether Google’s dominance allows it to dictate how news is accessed and monetized.

And on data protection, they’re reviewing how personal or proprietary information might be processed in the generation of summaries.

Google maintains that AI Overviews benefit users and drive traffic back to publishers by including citations. It also says the technology is still in testing and adjustments will follow based on feedback. Regulators want concrete data to back those claims.

Whatever happens in Italy could set an EU-wide precedent. The Digital Markets Act and AI Act already give regulators tools to demand transparency and accountability from large tech platforms.

If attribution or compensation becomes mandatory, every major search engine using AI-generated answers will need to adapt. That could redefine how digital content is valued and shared.

What it means for creators and brands

The Italian case may center on journalism, but its implications reach everyone producing online material. Thought leaders, marketers, and educators all depend on recognition. If AI redistributes knowledge without credit, your visibility and, eventually, your credibility can shrink.

Maintaining authorship in this new environment requires both technical and creative awareness. Structured author data, consistent bios, and verifiable profiles help AI models associate content with its origin.

Equally important is developing a recognisable voice. Distinct tone and phrasing leave linguistic fingerprints that machine-learning systems are more likely to preserve.

Authenticity and repetition across platforms reinforce those signals. When your voice is consistent, even a paraphrased version of your work carries traces of your identity. That’s how you remain visible when algorithms rewrite the conversation.

When AI visibility works against you

AI Overviews can unintentionally harm the very creators they reference. Three risks stand out.

1. Loss of context: Summaries flatten nuance. A quote pulled from a detailed article or interview might lose its intended meaning once isolated. That can change how audiences perceive your position.

2. Crowded authorship: AI outputs often blend multiple sources into one voice. Even if you’re cited, you share credit with a dozen others. Distinction fades, and so does authority.

3. Platform dependency: As Google and other search engines lean on AI-driven answers, creators become increasingly dependent on those systems for exposure. If the algorithm changes or attribution methods shift, your reach can drop overnight.

The solution is diversification. Strengthen visibility in spaces AI doesn’t mediate, such as newsletters, communities, direct subscriptions, and events. Those are the channels where your audience encounters you rather than a filtered version of your work.

How to keep your name visible in an AI-first search world

To stay visible, creators and brands need a strategy that combines technical precision with human storytelling.

1. Optimise for attribution. Use schema markup and structured data so search engines can identify you clearly. Add detailed author bios to every piece of content.

2. Build direct relationships. Encourage audiences to connect through channels you control—email lists, podcasts, courses, or communities. Dependency on search visibility decreases as engagement deepens.

3. Write with a recognisable style. Voice consistency helps both readers and algorithms associate content with your identity. Distinct phrasing can act like a signature.

4. Monitor AI mentions. Track when and where your content appears in AI outputs. Tools are emerging that flag generative references to your material. Awareness allows you to respond quickly if attribution is missing.

5. Join collective efforts. Industry groups and creator networks are beginning to push for clearer attribution standards. Collective pressure often brings more change than isolated complaints.

The principle is simple: make your identity unmistakable. When your technical footprint and personal style align, visibility follows naturally, even in AI-driven ecosystems.

The bigger picture: the fight for digital identity

At its core, the Italian complaint isn’t only about copyright or competition. It’s about ownership of identity in an era where machines curate human knowledge.

Every technological leap has forced creators to adapt. The printing press shifted power from scribes to publishers. Search engines shifted it from editors to algorithms. Generative AI is shifting it again — from websites to summaries. Each shift rewards those who move early to claim their space.

Digital identity will soon carry as much weight as intellectual property. The ability to be recognised by readers, by machines, and by markets will define credibility. Brands and individuals who treat identity as a measurable asset will have an edge over those who rely solely on reach.

The post Google’s AI overviews face Italian complaint: how to keep your name visible appeared first on Personal Branding Blog.